Bear witness and profit

12/10/21

Like it or not, eyewitness accounts of encounters with Sasquatch constitute the majority of the available evidence at this time. Some researchers will claim that the value of such evidence is tenuous at best. Certainly, compared to the more forensic types of evidence which take the form of tracks, scat and hair samples which is currently the gold standard of proof it can problematic. Experience in conducting hundreds of eyewitness interviews provided me with a level of expertise in separating the wheat from the chaff so to speak. If one examines the commonalities that the bulk of these testimonies share, obvious patterns start to emerge.

Some may argue that certain pieces of film footage are the smoking gun but these are far to vulnerable to interpretation once they are scrutinized by cynically minded “Authorities” or the amateur investigator. Often, the footage is explained away by the “Man in a suit argument” which while ridiculous in some cases there are more than enough hoaxes that fit that description to cast doubt on any video evidence captured regardless of merit. Hair samples that come back with ambiguous results due to lack of recognizable/comparable DNA to me point towards rather than away from the corporeal reality of the Bigfoot phenomenon. This same logic applies to scatological samples, similar to the old adage that states: “The absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence”. The gaps in our knowledge can only be filled through dedicated analysis of the existing hard evidence and the sharing of such evidence throughout the Bigfooting community. Obviously, mainstream science and our craven professors locked away from the discomfort dealing with the new knowledge in their Ivory Towers of Academia present the largest roadblock to successfully proving the existence of the North American ape. Evidence, such as there is, is plentiful and compelling and should be studied thoroughly and objectively instead of arbitrarily dismissing all of it as nonsense just because it contradicts ones current pet theory. In dealing with eyewitness accounts, one must simply learn to read between the lines to extract the useful from the conjectural.

But be warned, unrelated fringe phenomenon such as Light Orbs, UfOs, portals, Dogmen (hahahahahahahaha) and the like are starting to taint the search for G. blacki through spurious correlations made by conspiratorial individuals who seem only too happy to regulate this magnificent animal to realms of Science Fiction..Science Fact should be magical enough.